Skip to main content

Upgrading your SSIS Management Framework: Part 1

Background

Before SQL Server 2012, SQL Server Integration Services (SSIS) had no built-in logging, auditing, and configuration framework.  All of the pieces were available to build your own, but everyone ended up doing that just a little bit differently.  Most of us consultants came up with our own variation to implement at client sites and ensure that all of those functions at that one client were the same.  I'm especially proud of the framework that Rushabh Mehta and I developed that is published in Microsoft SQL Server Integration Services: Problem, Design, Solution (SSIS PDS) and implemented by many others as well.

Along came SSIS 2012, when Microsoft realized this "multiple-different frameworks" spread was happening, and thought "how cool would it be if we could standardize the framework so ALL our clients have the same one".  This would not only reduce initial development time of the framework, but also ensure that upgrades and future maintenance would go smoothly. Coinciding with (or perhaps due to) this decision, Microsoft moved the execution of SSIS packages to run inside of SQL Server.  Having a consistent framework is wonderful, and I'm a big fan of using the consistent built-in framework.

Upgrade Options

However, what do you do if you've already implemented a custom framework, similar to one in SSIS PDS?  There are a couple of options:

  1. Move lock, stock, and barrel to the new framework. To do this, you would have to upgrade all existing packages, remove the components that logged to the framework, and change your configurations schema to use parameters.  This means that you would never have to worry about upgrading your framework again because Microsoft will take care of it.  On the other hand, you would lose ties to your existing log records.  If you have a small number of packages or you have only used a custom framework for a short amount of time, I would recommend this option.
  2. Stick with what you've got. This option is the most easy to implement, but provides the least amount of value.  The new SSIS framework contains much more logging than most of the custom frameworks, and when a package fails and you don't know why, mo' logging = mo' better.  I do not recommend this option.
  3. Use a hybrid approach, which the potential to phase out the custom framework in the future.  This option includes a little bit of up-front work, but will be maintainable (and hopefully enhanced!) in future SSIS versions.

Okay, let’s do it!

Next week, we'll look at how to implement the hybrid approach based on the PDS framework.

Labels

Labels:

Comments

Cam said…
Hi great readingg your post
July 12, 2024 at 3:32 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Reporting Services 2008 Configuration Mistake

To start working with the management side of SQL Server Reporting Services 2008, I decided to set up a report server and report manager. Unfortunately, I made a mistake while setting up my configuration that left me a little perplexed. Here are the steps I took to cause, track down, and solve the issue. Problem: I began by opening the Reporting Services Configuration Manager from the Start Menu. I clicked through each of the menu options and accepted the defaults for any question with a warning symbol, since warning symbol typically designate an action item. After two minutes, all of the warning symbols had disappeared, and I was ready to begin managing my report server. Unfortunately, opening up a browser and trying to open up the report manager resulted in the dreaded " The report server has encountered a configuration error. (rsServerConfigurationError) " message. Sherlock-ing it: I put on my sleuthing hat and went to the log file directory: C:\Program Files\Microsoft...
51 comments
Read more

SQL Server 2016 versus 2014 Business Intelligence Features

Hello, SQL Server 2016 Yesterday, Microsoft announced the release of SQL Server 2016 on June 1st of this year: https://blogs.technet.microsoft.com/dataplatforminsider/2016/05/02/get-ready-sql-server-2016-coming-on-june-1st/ .  Along with performance benchmarks and a description of the new functionality, came the announcement of editions and features for the next release. Good-bye, Business Intelligence Edition The biggest surprise to me was the removal of the Business Intelligence edition that was initially introduced in SQL Server 2012.  Truthfully, it never seemed to fit in the environments where I worked, so I guess it makes sense.  Hopefully, fewer licensing options will make it easier for people to understand their licensing and pick the edition that works best for them. Feature Comparison Overall, the business intelligence services features included with each edition for SQL Server 2016 are fairly similar to SQL Server 2014.  Nothing has been "...
12 comments
Read more

Is Data Science a Buzzword? aka: My first Coursera Course

Data science and data scientists are all the rage right now in the information technology space. Every company wants one; every job candidate touts they are one. But what actually does that mean to companies and potential employees? I decided to take a course on data science to see if I could find out! My co-worker, Gabriella Melki, recommended the Coursera Data Science specialization by John Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. The entire specialization contains a set of 9 courses, but you can take each one individually. I started with the first course, called "The Data Scientist's Toolbox". Over the four week timeframe, I was able to view lectures and perform the assignments at my own pace. I've listed below my thoughts on the course and what I learned about data science. Week 1: Introduction to Data Science Data science is about data , specifically about answering questions, and science , following a method to discover an answer. A data scientist is the ...
4 comments
Read more